Advanced interpretation of WAIS-IV. The application of the CHC model to a WAIS-IV protocol

Lina Pezzuti, Clara Michelotti, Marco Lauriola, Margherita Lang

Accepted December 31, 2020

First published December 31, 2020

Abstract

A relevant change occurs with the publication of the fourth generation Wechsler Scales (WPPSI-IV, WISCIV and WAIS-IV), determined by the different theories of cognitive neuroscience based on clinical and neuropsychological
research. The first confirmatory factor analyses conducted on the US and Italian standardization samples of the WAIS-IV show the same four-factor structure. The WAIS-IV, in particular, allows the calculation of four indices (or factors): Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI), Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI), Working Memory Index (WMI) and Processing Speed Index (PSI). Each of the indices contributes to the total composite score or Intellectual Quotient. However, at the end of the
last century, numerous models of intelligence appeared, some of which led to the creation of new tools for assessing the construct or updating existing ones, and subsequent U.S. and Italian research have shown that the WAIS-IV data can also be read in the light of the Cattell, Horn, Carroll theory of intelligence (or CHC theory) distinguishing 5 factors: Crystallized Intelligence (Gc); Visual Processing (Gv); Fluid Intelligence (Gf); Short-Term Memory (Gsm); Processing Speed (Gs). The objective of this paper is to highlight through a clinical case the usefulness of using the five-factor CHC model instead of the four-factor model, particularly when one of the first factors is not interpretable as a unitary and cohesive ability.

References

  • BENSON, N., HULAC, D.M. & KRANZLER, J.H. (2010).Independent examination of the Wechsler Adult IntelligenceScale – Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV): What does the WAIS-IVmeasure? Psychological Assessment, 22 (1), 121.

  • BENTLER, P.M. (2005). EQS 6 structural equations program manual.Encino, CA: Multivariate Software (www.mvsoft.com).

  • BORNSTEIN, R.F. (2010). Psychoanalytic theory as a unifyingframework for 21st century personality assessment.Psychoanalytic Psychology, 27 (2), 133-152.

  • CARROLL, J.B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factoranalytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

  • CATTELL, R.B. (1987). Intelligence: Its structure, growth and action.North-Holland, Oxford, England.

  • CATTELL, R.B. & HORN, J.L. (1978). A check on the theory of fluidand crystallized intelligence with description of new subtestdesigns. Journal of Educational Measurement, 15, 139-164.

  • CHIARAVALLOTI, N.D., CHRISTODOULOU, C., DEMAREE,H.A. & DeLUCA, J. (2003). Differentiating simple versuscomplex processing speed: Influence on new learning andmemory performance. Journal of Clinical and ExperimentalNeuropsychology, 25 (4), 489-501.

  • DeLUCA, J., BARBIERI-BERGER, S. & JOHNSON, S.K. (1994).The nature of memory impairments in multiple sclerosis:Acquisition versus retrieval. Journal of Clinical and ExperimentalNeuropsychology, 16 (2), 183-189.

  • DeLUCA,J.,GAUDINO,E.A.,DIAMOND,B.J.,CHRISTODOULOU,C. & ENGEL, R.A. (1998). Acquisition and storage deficitsin multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical and ExperimentalNeuropsychology, 20 (3), 376-390.

  • DEMAREE, H.A., DeLUCA, J., GAUDINO, E.A. & DIAMOND,B.J. (1999). Speed of information processing as a key deficit inmultiple sclerosis: implications for rehabilitation. Journal ofNeurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 67 (5), 661-663.

  • FLANAGAN, D.P. & KAUFMAN, A.S. (2009). Fondamenti perl’assessment con la WISC-IV. It. ed. 2012, Firenze: Giunti OSOrganizzazioni Speciali.

  • FLANAGAN, D.P., McGREW, K.S. & ORTIZ, S.O. (2000). TheWechsler Intelligence Scales and Gf-Gc theory: A contemporaryapproach to interpretation. New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon.

  • FLANAGAN, D.P., ORTIZ, S.O. & ALFONSO, V.C. (2013). Essentialsof Cross-Battery Assessment (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

  • FRY, A.F. & HALE, S. (1996). Processing speed, working memory,and fluid intelligence: Evidence for a developmental cascade.Psychological Science, 7 (4), 237-241.

  • GAUDINO, E.A., CHIARAVALLOTI, N.D., DeLUCA, J. &DIAMOND, B.J. (2001). A comparison of memory performancein relapsing–remitting, primary progressive and secondaryprogressive, multiple sclerosis. Cognitive and BehavioralNeurology, 14 (1), 32-44.

  • GOTTFREDSON, L. & SAKLOFSKE, D.H. (2009). Intelligence:Foundations and issues in assessment. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 50 (3), 183.

  • HORN, J.L. (1985). Remodeling old models of intelligence. In B.B.Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence: Theories, measurementsand applications. New York, NY: John Wiley.

  • HORN, J.L. (1991). Measurement of intellectual capabilities: A reviewof theory. In K.S. McGrew, J.K. Werder & R.W. Woodcock (Eds.),Woodcock-Johnson Technical Manual. Chicago, IL: RiversidePublishing.

  • HORN, J.L. & NOLL, J. (1994). A system for understanding cognitivecapabilities: A theory and the evidence on which it is based.Current Topics in Human Intelligence, 4, 151-203.

  • HORN, J.L. & NOLL, J. (1997). Human cognitive capabilities: Gf-Gctheory. In D.P. Flanagan & P.L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporaryintellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues. New York, NY:Guilford Press.

  • KAUFMAN, A.S., RAIFORD, S.E. & COALSON, D.L. (2016).Intelligent testing with the WISC-V. Hoboken, NJ.: John Wiley.

  • KENNEDY, J.E., CLEMENT, P.F. & CURTISS, G. (2003). WAIS-IIIprocessing speed index scores after TBI: The influence of workingmemory, psychomotor speed and perceptual processing. TheClinical Neuropsychologist, 17 (3), 303-307.

  • KYLLONEN, P.C. & CHRISTAL, R.E. (1990). Reasoning ability is(little more than) working-memory capacity?! Intelligence, 14(4), 389-433.LANG, M., MICHELOTTI, C., BARDELLI, E. & PEZZUTI, L. (inpress). WAIS-IV: Lettura dei risultati e interpretazione clinica (2aed.). Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.

  • LENGENFELDER, J., BRYANT, D., DIAMOND, B.J., KALMAR, J.H.,MOORE, N.B. & DeLUCA, J. (2006). Processing speed interactswith working memory efficiency in multiple sclerosis. Archives ofClinical Neuropsychology, 21 (3), 229-238.

  • LICHTENBERGER, E.O. & KAUFMAN, A.S. (2009). Essentials ofWAIS-IV assessment. New York, NY: John Wiley.

  • MADIGAN, N.K., DeLUCA, J., DIAMOND, B.J., TRAMONTANO,G. & AVERILL, A. (2000). Speed of information processing intraumatic brain injury: Modality-specific factors. The Journal ofHead Trauma Rehabilitation, 15 (3), 943-956.

  • MARTIN, T.A. & BUSH, S.S. (2008). Special Issue: GeriatricNeuropsychology. NeuroRehabilitation, 23 (5), 447-454.

  • McGREW, K.S. (1997). Analysis of the major intelligence batteriesaccording to a proposed comprehensive Gf-Gc framework. InD.P.Flanagan,J.L.Genshaft&P.L.Harrison(Eds.),Contemporaryintellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues. New York, NY:Guilford Press.

  • NEISSER, U., BOODOO, G., BOUCHARD, T.J., BOYKIN, A.W.,BRODY, N., CECI, S.J., HALPERN, D.F., LOEHLIN, J.C.,PERLOFF, R., STERNBERG, R.J. & URBINA, S. (1996).Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51(2), 77-101.

  • ORSINI, A. & PEZZUTI, L. (2013). WAIS-IV. Contributo alla taraturaitaliana (16-69). Firenze: Giunti OS Organizzazioni Speciali.

  • ORSINI, A. & PEZZUTI, L. (2015). WAIS-IV. Contributo alla taraturaitaliana (70-90 anni). Firenze: Giunti OS Organizzazioni Speciali.

  • ORSINI, A., PEZZUTI, L. & HULBERT, S. (2015). The unitary abilityof IQ and indexes in WAIS-IV. European Journal of PsychologicalAssessment, 1-8.

    doi.org/10.1027/1015- 5759/a000306
  • PEZZUTI, L. (2016). The GAI and CPI in the Italian standardizationof the WAIS-IV and their clinical implications. BPA-AppliedPsychology Bulletin, 276, 19-37.

  • PEZZUTI, L., LANG, M., ROSSETTI, S. & MICHELOTTI, C. (2018).CHC model according to Weiss. Journal of Individual Differences,39 (1), 53-59.

  • PRICE, J.M. & ZWOLINSKI, J. (2010). The nature of child andadolescent vulnerability: History and definitions. In R.E. Ingram& J.M. Price (Eds.), Vulnerability to psychopathology: Risk acrossthe lifespan (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

  • REYNOLDS, C.R. & KAMPHAUS, R.W. (2015). The ReynoldsIntellectual Assessment Scales, and the Reynolds IntellectualScreening Test. Lutz, FL: Par.

  • RYAN, J.J., KREINER, D.S. & BURTON, D.B. (2002). Does highscatter affect the predictive validity of WAIS-III IQs? AppliedNeuropsychology, 9, 173-178.

  • RYAN, J.J., KREINER, D.S., GONTKOVSKY, S.T., GOLDEN, C.J. &MYERS-FABIAN, A. (2019). Frequency of occurrence of fourand five-factor WAIS-IV profiles. Applied Neuropsychology:Adult, 1-11. Available at https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cps_facarticles/1627.

  • SCHNEIDER, W.J. & McGREW, K.S. (2012). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of intelligence. In D.P. Flanagan & P.L. Harrison(Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests andissues (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

  • SCHNEIDER, W.J. & McGREW, K.S. (2018). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In D.P. Flanagan & E.M.McDonough (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment:Theories, tests, and issues. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

  • SHERMAN, E.M., STRAUSS, E. & SPELLACY, F. (1997). Validityof the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) in adultsreferred for neuropsychological assessment after head injury. TheClinical Neuropsychologist, 11, 34-45.

  • WECHSLER, D. (2003). WISC-IV. Wechsler Intelligence Scale forChildren-Fourth Edition. It. ed. A. Orsini & L. Pezzuti (Eds.),2012. Firenze: Giunti OS Organizzazioni Speciali.

  • WECHSLER, D. (2008). WAIS-IV. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition. It. ed. A. Orsini & L. Pezzuti (Eds.), 2013. Firenze:Giunti OS Organizzazioni Speciali.

  • WEISS, L.G., CHEN, H., HARRIS, J.G., HOLDNACK, J.A. &SAKLOFSKE, D.H. (2010). WAIS-IV use in societal context.In WAIS-IV clinical use and interpretation. New York, NY:Academic Press.

  • WEISS, L.G., KEITH, T.Z., ZHU, J. & CHEN, H. (2013). WAIS-IVand clinical validation of the four- and five-factor interpretativeapproaches. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31 (2),94-113.

  • WEISS, L.G., SAKLOFSKE, D.H., COALSON, D. & RAIFORD, S.E.(Eds.) (2010). WAIS-IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives. New York, NY: Academic Press.

  • WEISS, L.G., SAKLOFSKE, D.H., HOLDNACK, J.A. & PRIFITERA,A. (2016). WISC-V: Advances in the assessment of intelligence. SanDiego, CA: Academic Press.

  • ZHU, J. & WEISS, L.G. (2005). The Wechsler Scales. In D.P. Flanagan& P.L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment:Theories, tests and issues. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

SHOW ALL REFERENCES (48)HIDE REFERENCES

Related articles

Article info

Issue:

Keywords:

Views:

359

Downloads:

25

Cite the article:

Author Surname Author Initial. Title. Publication Title. Year Published;Volume number(Issue number):Pages Used. doi:DOI Number.


Pezzuti Lina. Michelotti Clara. Lauriola Marco. Lang Margherita. Advanced interpretation of WAIS-IV. The application of the CHC model to a WAIS-IV protocol. BPA Applied Psychology Bulletin. 2020;289(1):49-60.

Citation tool

How to cite this article

Author Surname Author Initial. Title. Publication Title. Year Published;Volume number(Issue number):Pages Used. doi:DOI Number.


Pezzuti Lina. Michelotti Clara. Lauriola Marco. Lang Margherita. Advanced interpretation of WAIS-IV. The application of the CHC model to a WAIS-IV protocol. BPA Applied Psychology Bulletin. 2020;289(1):49-60.